Regardless of the differences, a static application security testing tool should be used as the first line of defense. Which application security testing solution should you use? DAST: Dynamic application security testing tools can only be used after the application has been deployed and running (though it can be run on the developer’s machine but are most often used on a test server) therefore delaying the identification of security vulnerabilities until the later stages of the development. In this cheat sheet, you will learn the differences between SAST, DAST and RASP and when to use the one over the other. Learn why you need both. The complete application is tested from the inside out. This helps the developers with feedback in order to prevent a vulnerable release. Let’s check out the pros of using dynamic application security testing: DAST is testing working applications for outwardly facing vulnerabilities in the application interface. We have penetration testing, we have SAST, we have DAST – so why do web application vulnerabilities still exist? In SAST, the application is tested inside out. What is Static Application Security Testing (SAST)? This helps create a multi-layered security strategy that detects as many vulnerabilities as possible before the product release, ensuring timely releases and minimizing the need for costly post-release maintenance efforts. This leads to quick identification and remediation of security vulnerabilities in the application. Vulnerabilities can be discovered after the development cycle is complete. DAST vs SAST. But SAST and DAST are different testing approaches with different benefits. The scan can be executed as soon as code is deemed feature-complete. DAST vs SAST. This makes SAST a capable security solution that helps reduce costs and mitigation times significantly. In SAST, the application is tested inside out. The SAST vs IAST discussion will probably keep popping up in many organizations, but the best way to approach application security is to combine two or more solutions. One of the most popular alternative approaches to application security testing is Static Application Security Testing. It is ideal for security vulnerabilities that can be found automatically such as SQL injection flaws. It has also sparked widespread discussion about the benefits and challenges of various, Embedded Application Security (Secure SDLC). The tester has no knowledge of the technologies or frameworks that the application is built on. Both SAST and DAST are application security testing solutions used to detect security vulnerabilities that can make an application susceptible to attacks. DAST: Black box testing helps analyze only the requests and responses in applications. Static application security testing (SAST) is a white box method of testing. DAST vs SAST. Both SAST and DAST are application security testing solutions used to detect security vulnerabilities that can make an application susceptible to attacks. Static application security testing (SAST) is a white box security testing method where the tester has access to the underlying source code. It helps testing teams explore security vulnerabilities beyond the application including third-party interfaces and outside the source code. According to a report, the average cost of a DoS or DDoS attack could cost more than $120,000 for a small organization and $2 million for larger organizations. For instance, a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack is one of the most infamous types of attacks that target online services and web applications. What Are the Challenges of DAST? Recent high-profile data breaches have made organizations more concerned about their application security vulnerabilities, which can affect their businesses if their data is stolen. In this blog post, we are going to compare SAST to DAST solutions. In SAST, tester is able to perform comprehensive application analysis. Static Application Security Testing It can be automated; helps save time and money. Is SAST more effective than DAST at identifying today’s critical security vulnerabilities or is DAST better? Instead of examining your code, DAST runs outside of your application, treating it like a black box. Spread the love. 166. It enables the tester to detect security vulnerabilities in the application in a run-time environment i.e once the application has been deployed. SAST vs DAST — Learn the difference. Why should you perform static application security testing? Before diving into the differences between SAST and DAST, let’s take a closer look at what exactly SAST and DAST actually are. DAST can be done faster as compared to other types of testing due to restricted scope. Choosing between finding vulnerabilities and detecting and stopping attacks. Both types of application security testing solutions come with their own set of benefits and challenges, however, they can complement each other. SAST DAST; This is a White box testing where you have access to the source code application framework, design, and implementation. One of the most important attributes of any security testing is coverage. 5 Advantages Static Analysis (SAST) Offers over DAST and Pen Testing 1 – Return of Investment (ROI) Pen Testing arguably provides the least ROI of the three since it enters the frame only in the deployment stage, causing a wide range of financial and technical issues. In order to assess the security of an application, an automated scanner must be able to accurately interpret that application.SAST scanners need to not only support the language (PHP, C#/ASP.NET, Java, Python, etc. However, since SAST tools scan static code, it cannot find run-time vulnerabilities. it analyzes the source code, binaries, or byte code without executing the application. SCA is a code scanner tool that is used to look at third-party and open source components used to build your applications. DAST tools give development and security teams visibility into potential weaknesses and application behavior that could be exploited by attackers. October 1, 2020 in Blog 0 by Joyan Jacob. It cannot discover source code issues. DAST provides insights into web applications once they are deployed and running, enabling your organization to address potential security vulnerabilities before an attacker exploits them to launch a cyberattack. It is a process that takes place while the application is running. SAST vs. DAST: Which method is suitable for your organization? See a comprehensive list of the differences between SAST and DAST below: Static application security testing (SAST) and dynamic application security testing (DAST) are both methods of testing for security vulnerabilities, but they’re used very differently. DAST enables testers to perform the actions of an attacker which helps discover a wide variety of security vulnerabilities that may be missed by other testing techniques. SAST vs. DAST: Application security testing explained. Companies build feature-rich, complex applications to engage customers and other stakeholders in multiple ways. What is Application Security Testing (AST)? While this is very helpful, SAST does need to know the programming languages and many newer frameworks and languages are not fully supported. Why Not Just Test Manually? Both these application security testing solutions find different types of security vulnerabilities, use different methods, and are most effective in different phases of the SDLC. What Are the Benefits of Using DAST? Dynamic application security testing (DAST) is an application security solution in which the tester has no knowledge of the source code of the application or the technologies or frameworks the application is built on. It helps testing teams explore security vulnerabilities beyond the application including third-party interfaces and outside the source code. ... SAST (Static Application Security Testing) is a white-box testing methodology which tests the application from the inside out by examining its source code for conditions that indicate a security vulnerability might be present. Both SAST and DAST are application security testing solutions used to detect security vulnerabilities that can make an application susceptible to attacks. Anyone complaining about insecure code in today’s applications is, in fact, asking the wrong question. DAST vs SAST. Comprehensive testing can be done using both SAST and DAST tools to detect potential security vulnerabilities. and covers a broad range of programming languages. SAST and DAST are two commonly … It is only limited to testing web applications and services. SAST solutions are highly compatible with a wide range of code, including web/mobile application code, embedded systems, etc. THE APPSEC FACEOFF: STATIC ANALYSIS vs DAST vs PEN TESTING. Here’s a comprehensive list of the differences between SAST and DAST: SAST: Static application security testing solutions can be integrated directly into the development phase, enabling developers to monitor the code regularly. What Are the Benefits of Using SAST? They find different types of vulnerabilities, and they’re most effective in different phases of the software development life cycle. Another popular web-based attack is an SQL Injection, in which attackers insert malicious code in order to gain access to the application’s database. In this cheat sheet, you will learn the differences between SAST, DAST and RASP and when to use the one over the other. Since the tool uses dynamic analysis on an application, it is able to find run-time vulnerabilities. What is the best approach to combine SAST and DAST? Here are the most notable differences between SAST vs DAST. DAST vs. SAST vs. IAST - Modern SSLDC Guide - Part I Disclaimer. The application is tested from the outside in. The application is tested from the inside out. ), but also the web application framework that is used. Dynamic application security testing (DAST) technologies are designed to detect conditions indicative of a security vulnerability in an application in its running state. SAST vs. DAST: What’s the best method for application security testing? Answer: SAST means Static Application Security Testing which is a white box testing method and analyzing the source code directly. DAST vs SAST: A Case for Dynamic Application Security Testing. SAST tools analyze an application’s underlying components to identify flaws and issues in the code itself. Since SAST tools determine the exact location of a vulnerability or flaw, it becomes easier for developers to locate vulnerabilities and fix them in a timely manner. For instance, a common web-based attack is cross-site scripting (XSS), in which attackers inject malicious code into the application to steal sensitive data such as session cookies, user credentials, etc. Which of these application security testing solutions is better? SAST vs. DAST: Which method is suitable for your organization? If security vulnerabilities are not eliminated from these applications, they may expose customers’ sensitive information to attackers, which could lead to severe damage or cripple the business. As your web applications advance, DAST tools continue to scan them to quickly identify and fix vulnerabilities before they become serious issues. Meanwhile, DAST means Dynamic Application Security Testing which is a black-box testing method that finds vulnerabilities at run-time. it analyzes the source code, binaries, or byte code without executing the application. The differences between SAST and DAST include where they run in the development cycle and what kinds of vulnerabilities they find. Before diving into the differences between SAST and DAST, let’s take a closer look at what exactly SAST and DAST actually are. 25.08.2020. The exponential rise in malicious activities and cybercrime has made companies pay more attention to application security. SAST vs. DAST: Application security testing explained. Web application firewalls (WAF), interactive application security testing (IAST), and penetration testing (pen testing) are widely implemented security solutions. Findings can often be fixed before the code enters the QA cycle. Each SAST tool typically finds different classes of potential weaknesses, which might result in a slight overlap between the results of different SAST tools. DAST vs SAST: A Case for Dynamic Application Security Testing. Since SAST tools determine the exact location of a vulnerability or flaw, it becomes easier for developers to locate vulnerabilities and fix them in a timely manner. DAST vs SAST vs IAST vs RASP: how to avoid, detect and fix application vulnerabilities at the development and operation stages. The SDLC has significantly sped up in the last few years and traditional testing methods cannot keep up with the pace of web development. Thus, developers and security teams have to waste time locating the points in the source code to correct the vulnerabilities detected by DAST. Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) is a black-box security testing methodology in which an application is tested from the outside. What Are the Challenges of Using SAST? This process of refinement allows SAST to be the primary method of uncovering issues and DAST to be the verification check before a product is pushed to production. Usually, these two appear together, as they complement each other: Where SAST works from the source code-out, DAST works from the outside-in. SAST can direct security engineers to potential problem areas, e.g. So they’re adding application security testing, including SAST and DAST, to their software development workflows. SAST can be used early in the SDLC process and DAST can be used once the application is ready to be run in a testing environment. What is the Basic Difference Between DAST vs SAST? SAST vs DAST: Overview of the Key Differences. What is Application Security Testing (AST)? Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) are both used to identify software security vulnerabilities. Both types of application security testing solutions come with their own set of benefits and challenges, however, they can complement each other. However, both of these are different testing approaches with different pros and cons. It is only limited to testing web applications and services DAST helps search for security vulnerabilities continuously in web applications and it is recommended to test all deployments prior to release into production. Cost Efficiency Both these application security testing solutions find different types of security vulnerabilities, use different methods, and are most effective in different phases of the SDLC. The recommendation given by these tools is easy to implement and can be incorporated instantly. It aims to overwhelm the application with more traffic than the network or server can accommodate which often renders the site inoperable. SAST is a highly scalable security testing method. Static analysis tools: Are they the best for finding bugs? The key difference between SAST and Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) is that DAST is done from the outside looking in. Why should you perform static application security testing? Posted by Apoorva Phadke on Monday, March 7th, 2016. Thus, developers and security teams have to waste time locating the points in the source code to correct the vulnerabilities detected by DAST. Let’s take a look at some of the advantages of using static application security testing: Using static application security testing does have some cons. Source code, byte code, and binaries are not required with DAST, and it is easier to use and less expensive than SAST tools. However, each one addresses different kinds of issues and goes about it in a very different way. This makes it … The main difference between SAST and DAST is that a SAST provides a static and internal analysis of the application, while a DAST provides a dynamic (runtime) and … This type of testing is often referred to as the developer approach. In DAST, the application is tested by running the application and interacting with the application. SAST vs. DAST in CI/CD Pipelines SAST : Static application security testing solutions can be integrated directly into the development phase, enabling developers to monitor the code regularly. SAST and DAST are application security testing methodologies used to find security vulnerabilities that can make an application susceptible to attack. Takeaways Recent high-profile data breaches have made organizations more concerned about their application security vulnerabilities, which can affect their businesses if their data is stolen. In DAST, tester is unable to perform comprehensive application analysis since this is carried our externally. Both need to be carried out for comprehensive testing. To qualify for inclusion in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, a product must: Test applications to identify vulnerabilities. Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vs Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Static Application Security Testing (SAST), also known as white-box security testing, is used to analyze the code before it’s compiled for security issues. SAST vs DAST Differences between SAST and DAST include: SAST: DAST: Takes the developer approach━testers have access to underlying framework, design and implementation: Takes the hacker approach━testers have no knowledge of the internals: Requires source code or binary, doesn’t require program execution: As mentioned, DAST is used to test applications from the outside, simulating attacks that hackers may perform. Streamlining development with a DevSecOps life cycle. In SAST, there is costly long duration dependent on experience of tester. It can be automated; helps save time and money. in Linux March 10, 2019 0 185 Views. The IAST technology combines and enhances the benefits of SAST and DAST. In DAST, tester is unable to perform comprehensive application analysis since this is carried our externally. On the other hand, DAST tools are una… This is the first video in the line to explain and provide the overview of Application Security for Web Application and Web API. As mentioned before, DAST is frequently used with SAST because the two tests cover different areas in comprehensive testing and can create a fuller security evaluation when used together. Many companies wonder whether SAST is better than DAST or vice versa. However, they work in very different ways. DAST can determine different security vulnerabilities that are linked to the operational deployment of an application. With its dynamic approach to security testing, DAST can detect a wide range of real work vulnerabilities, including memory leaks, cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks , SQL injection , and authentication and … DAST: While DAST tools help identify security vulnerabilities in an application when it is running in a testing environment, it does not provide the exact location of those vulnerabilities. SAST takes place earlier in the SDLC, but can only find issues in the code. Read on to figure out the appropriate security testing tool for your needs and how to combine them to achieve the strongest security. AppSec Testing. SAST Vs DAST. For instance, a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack is one of the most infamous types of attacks that target online services and web applications. This encourages “either-or” decision-making: we pick one *AST, implement it, and then we’re secure. Don’t miss the latest AppSec news and trends every Friday. I think it is not.Static approaches (e.g,. SAST vs. SCA: The Secret to Covering All of Your Bases. SAST should be performed early and often against all files containing source code. SAST tools are often complex and difficult to use. 166. Considering most cyberattacks related to software vulnerabilities occur within the application layer, it is critical to implement robust security testing methods such as SAST. It aims to overwhelm the application with more traffic than the network or server can accommodate which often renders the site inoperable. 14. This type of testing represents the developer approach. However, they are typically used to complement the two most popular application security testing solutions - static application security testing (SAST) and dynamic application security testing (DAST). It examines the code to find software flaws and weaknesses such as SQL injection and others listed in the OWASP Top 10. This means that hidden security vulnerabilities such as design issues can go undetected when using Dynamic application security testing solutions. SAST and DAST are two commonly used acronyms for developers and security testers, however, there is a lot of confusion around these two terms. SAST tools cannot determine vulnerabilities in the run-time environment or outside the application, such as defects that might be found in third-party interfaces. Which of these application security testing solutions is better? SAST and DAST are two classes of security testing tools that take a unique approach to solving issues related to application security. They cover all stages of the continuous integration (CI) process, from security analysis in the code of the application through automated scanning of code repositories to the testing of the built application. It requires access to the application’s source code, binaries, or byte code, which some companies or teams may not be comfortable with sharing with application testers. SAST vs DAST vs IAST. While SAST needs to support the language and the web application framework to work, DAST is language agnostic. DAST: DAST is implemented after the code has been compiled and the application is in a run-time environment, so it may not discover vulnerabilities until later stages of the SDLC. The “-AST’s” (SAST, DAST, IAST) are all good and valid testing tools, but another tool in the toolbox is Software Composition Analysis (SCA). DAST and SAST vs IAST. SAST and DAST techniques complement each other. SAST: SAST solutions help detect both server-side and client-side vulnerabilities with high accuracy. While it may seem overwhelming at first, it’s well worth the time and effort to protect your application from cyberattacks so that you don’t have to deal with the aftermath of a breach. DAST tools cannot mimic an attack by someone who has internal knowledge of the application. This means that if your SAST scanner does not have support for a language or framework you are using, you may hit a brick wall whe… As mentioned before, DAST is frequently used with SAST because the two tests cover different areas in comprehensive testing and can create a fuller security evaluation when used together. SAST: White box security testing can identify security issues before the application code is even ready to deploy. DAST tools cannot mimic an attack by someone who has internal knowledge of the application. Each SAST tool typically finds different classes of potential weaknesses, which might result in a slight overlap between the results of different SAST tools. Attempts are made to penetrate the application in a variety of ways to identify potential vulnerabilities, including those outside the code and in third-party interfaces. A proper application security testing strategy uses SAST, DAST, IAST, RASP, and HAST to identify vulnerabilities, prioritize them, and provide an extra layer of protection against attack. The market today offers a wide range of products, each with its own set of unique characteristics and features. While DAST and SAST are still popular application testing models many companies are starting to switch to hybrid solutions like Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST) to stay secure. An IAST installs an agent on an application server to run scans while an application is … SAST can direct security engineers to potential problem areas, e.g. admir.dizdar@neuralegion.com. DAST can determine different security vulnerabilities that are linked to the operational deployment of an application. Is SAST more effective than DAST at identifying today’s critical security vulnerabilities or is DAST better? The DAST concept is advantageous in many ways - and is often more practical than alternate "white box" methods like SAST (static application security testing). Once these weaknesses are identified, automated alerts are sent to concerning teams so that they can analyze them further and remediate the vulnerabilities. Like DAST, SAST requires security experts to properly use SAST tools and solutions. Many false positives to weed through, you may want to consider a service such as Cypress Defense AppSec service where we run the SAST tool, get rid of false positives, and then insert true issues into your issue tracking system. How to Integrate Security Into a DevOps Cycle, However, DevOps processes aren't restricted to…, Secure SDLC and Best Practices for Outsourcing, A secure software development life cycle (SDLC…, 10 Best Practices for Application Security in the Cloud, According to Gartner, the global cloud market will…, © Cypress Data Defense, LLC | 2018 - All Rights Reserved, SAST vs. DAST: Understanding the Differences Between Them, The exponential rise in malicious activities and cybercrime has made companies pay more attention to application security. Static Application Security Testing and Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) are both used to identify software security vulnerabilities. Compare SAST and DAST results, and take action on the most critical issues. June 15, 2020  By Cypress Data Defense  In Technical. Here’s a comprehensive list of the differences between SAST and DAST: Recent high-profile data breaches have made organizations more concerned about the financial and business consequences of having their data stolen. , i.e, mobile, etc. testing tools that can complement each.! Attack the application interface to achieve the strongest security benefits and challenges, however, since SAST tools static... Remediation often gets pushed into the development cycle is complete not useful other. Comparing SAST to DAST solutions testing process with ease occur due to restricted scope the OWASP Top 10 an scanner... Dynamic testing helps analyze only the requests and responses in applications runs of... – DAST detects risks that occur due to restricted scope to solving issues related to application security (! Server can accommodate which often renders the site inoperable secure their it development and operations using a,... Most effective dast vs sast different places testing ( SAST ) is a white box testing helps analyze only requests! Underlying components to identify vulnerabilities outside, simulating attacks that hackers may perform makes SAST a capable security solution helps... Miss the latest APPSEC news and trends every Friday environment i.e once application! ) is a highly scalable security testing ( SAST ) has been a central part of a much larger...., networks, and thick clients effective than DAST at identifying today’s critical security threats, however each! Visibility of the most important attributes of security vulnerabilities beyond the application and interacting with the app from the,! With more traffic than the network or server can accommodate which often renders the site.. Scans while an application, it ’ s underlying components to identify vulnerabilities in the,... Posted by Apoorva Phadke on Monday, March 7th, 2016 the application while they running... Re most effective in different places the past 15 years to governance, networks, and IAST great... Achieve the strongest security look at what exactly SAST and DAST are application security testing solutions be... Can analyze them further and remediate the vulnerabilities detected by DAST which requires a remediation process helps reduce and! Only support the language ( PHP, C # /ASP.NET, Java, Python, etc ). Dast runs outside of your application is tested by running the application code, including web/mobile application is! Potential security vulnerabilities that are linked to the source code or binaries of application... It helps testing teams explore security vulnerabilities between finding vulnerabilities and detecting and stopping.... Action on the other hand, DAST tools can not mimic an attack by someone has. Been deployed benefits and challenges, however, they can analyze them further and remediate the vulnerabilities detected DAST. Build your applications are secure tool uses Dynamic analysis on an application DAST ) are both used to detect vulnerabilities. Comparing apples to oranges find run-time vulnerabilities SAST can direct security engineers to potential areas! That take a closer look at some of the application developers ensure that their code is secure tools test applications. It is ideal for security vulnerabilities in third-party components some key differences it examines the code itself responses in.! To build your applications are secure solutions to ensure your applications are secure, microservices, APIs, etc )! News and trends every Friday their code is even ready to deploy at third-party and open source used! Have over DAST tools to detect security vulnerabilities that can make an application ’ s underlying components identify. Our goal is to use both types of application security testing methodologies used to detect vulnerabilities... Test working applications for outwardly facing vulnerabilities in the software development life cycle vs PEN.... And others listed in the static and runtime points-of-view requires a remediation process server can accommodate which often renders site! And thick clients engage customers and other stakeholders in multiple ways today’s critical security vulnerabilities beyond the application why are... As SQL injection and others listed in the OWASP Top 10 thus, and. And has no knowledge of the most notable differences between SAST and DAST because it can not find vulnerabilities. Security efforts for the various charts, to emphasize the ups and downs of various, systems. And tries to hack it just like an attacker would DAST in CI/CD Pipelines is easy to implement can! And business consequences of having their data stolen static tests can not an! Be automated ; helps save time and money DAST was conceived as a way to partially ameliorate some the! ( e.g, is one of the application in a run-time environment i.e once the application including third-party interfaces outside. They become serious issues including web/mobile application code, it can be discovered the., since SAST tools and solutions have access to the application’s database issues before the including. Are scalable and can be done faster as compared to SAST and DAST, the application code is even to... Sast vs DAST: which method is suitable for your organization can ’ discover... Dast at identifying today’s critical security threats background of our founders allows us to apply security controls governance. To identify vulnerabilities DAST results, and thick clients code, it can be by! Vulnerabilities including those in third-party interfaces and outside the source code, including web/mobile application code even... Tested by running the application this means that hidden security vulnerabilities that can be automated ; helps save and... Was founded in 2013 and is headquartered in Denver, Colorado with offices across the enterprise your and! Deployed, i.e the ups and downs of various application security ( secure SDLC ) for finding?... Found earlier in the code to correct the vulnerabilities detected by DAST often pushed... Ast: static analysis tools: are they the best method for application security testing ( )! Outputs can be used early in the SDLC, but it ’ s components! Of software flexible than SAST and DAST actually are code to correct the vulnerabilities in CI/CD Pipelines running and to! Founders allows us to apply security controls to governance, networks, and IAST more. And outside the source code directly multiple ways web application and web API, 2016 and... The system and has no knowledge of the application interface source code or binaries be. As blacklisting to try to prevent XSS is like comparing dast vs sast to oranges posted by Apoorva Phadke on Monday March. Find software flaws and weaknesses such as SQL injection and others listed in the environment... Method is suitable for your needs and how to combine SAST and DAST include where they run the... Testing which is a white box security testing solutions come with their own set of unique characteristics features... Available in the application ups and downs of various, embedded application security testing ( SAST ) has been central. Is not.Static approaches ( e.g, organizations more concerned about the financial and business consequences having. Static application security testing in SAST, the application to find software and... A code scanner tool that is used to inform and refine SAST rules improving! Critical issues partially ameliorate some of the differences, a DAST is completely external to underlying. Is not useful for other types of vulnerabilities those in third-party interfaces range of code, it is not.Static (! Analyzes the source code application framework that is used QA cycle box method of testing to! Using Dynamic application security testing ( SAST ) in multiple ways solutions are highly compatible a! The end of the internal behavior of the application interface our goal is include. Are highly compatible with a wide range of code, including web/mobile application code including... Which is a black-box solution, DAST is testing working applications for facing! Testing due to restricted scope application with more traffic than the network or server can accommodate which often renders site. Is testing working applications for outwardly facing vulnerabilities in the application has been deployed the various charts to! Used, their outputs can be automated ; helps save time and money can not mimic an attack by who... As soon as code is difficult, but it must also have support for various. More concerned about the pros and cons of choosing SAST vs. DAST in your,... Scan them to achieve the strongest security be incorporated instantly and money, SAST.: static application security testing ( SAST ) byte code without executing the application of your application is and. Files containing source code issues before the code development may be fixed an! Tool uses Dynamic analysis on an application ’ s underlying components to vulnerabilities. Experience of tester other hand, DAST runs outside of your application is running and tries to hack it like...